Run 3 (Mar 2026)
Run 1 (Nov 2025)
Strain: Wedding Cake
Zone: Zone 1 (Flower)
Plants: 72
Lights: 24 Gavita 1700e DE
Media: 3-gal rockwool
Dry weight: 35,562g (78.4 lb)
Dry/light: 3.27 lb/light
Dry/plant: 1.09 lb/plant
THC: 28.4%
Total cannabinoids: 31.2%
Water activity: 0.58
Goyle Score: 75
Harvest: March 15, 2026
Strain: Wedding Cake
Zone: Zone 1 (Flower)
Plants: 72
Lights: 24 Gavita 1700e DE
Media: 3-gal rockwool
Dry weight: 32,388g (71.4 lb)
Dry/light: 2.98 lb/light
Dry/plant: 0.99 lb/plant
THC: 26.1%
Total cannabinoids: 29.3%
Water activity: 0.61
Goyle Score: 62
Harvest: November 10, 2025
Subject: Wedding Cake: Run 3
Strain: Wedding Cake
Harvest: March 15, 2026
Zone: Zone 1 (Flower)
Plants: 72
Lights: 24 Gavita 1700e DE
Dry weight: 35,562g (78.4 lb)
Dry/light: 3.27 lb/light
Dry/plant: 1.09 lb/plant
THC: 28.4%
Water activity: 0.58
Goyle Score: 75
Compare: Wedding Cake: Run 1
Strain: Wedding Cake
Harvest: November 10, 2025
Zone: Zone 1 (Flower)
Plants: 72
Lights: 24 Gavita 1700e DE
Dry weight: 32,388g (71.4 lb)
Dry/light: 2.98 lb/light
Dry/plant: 0.99 lb/plant
THC: 26.1%
Water activity: 0.61
Goyle Score: 62
🏆 Wedding Cake: Run 3 wins
Run 3 outperformed Run 1 across every measured outcome. Yield increased 9.7% on the same plant count and light setup, while potency gained 2.3 percentage points. Tighter environment control during weeks 4-6 and a longer dry are the strongest differences to investigate, not proven causes.
Strongest candidate: Environment stability during the critical mid-flower stretch: Run 3 held day temps within a 1.2°F band vs Run 1's 3.8°F swing.
📊 Batch Metrics Comparison
| Metric |
Run 3 (Mar 2026) |
Run 1 (Nov 2025) |
Delta |
|
Yield / Plant
|
1.09 lb/plant |
0.99 lb/plant |
+10.1% |
|
Yield / Light
|
3.27 lb/light |
2.98 lb/light |
+9.7% |
|
THC
|
28.4% |
26.1% |
+2.3 pts |
|
Total Cannabinoids
|
31.2% |
29.3% |
+1.9 pts |
|
Total Dry Weight
|
78.4 lb |
71.4 lb |
+9.8% |
|
Dry / Wet Ratio
|
16.1% |
15.6% |
+3.2% |
|
Water Activity
|
0.58 |
0.61 |
-0.03 |
|
Avg Day Temp
|
79.2°F |
80.8°F |
-1.6°F |
|
Day Temp Variance
|
±0.6°F |
±1.9°F |
-68% |
|
Avg Day RH
|
52.1% |
56.8% |
-4.7% |
|
Avg Night VPD
|
1.18 kPa |
0.94 kPa |
+0.24 kPa |
|
Dry Duration
|
12 days |
9 days |
+3 days |
|
Flower Duration
|
63 days |
60 days |
+3 days |
|
Avg Runoff EC
|
4.2 mS/cm |
4.8 mS/cm |
-0.6 mS/cm |
|
Goyle Score
|
75 |
62 |
+13 |
🔍 What Mattered
+0.18 lb/light
Tighter temperature control during weeks 4-6 is a plausible contributor to the stronger result
high confidence
favors Run 3
Tap for details →
+0.08 lb/light
The longer dry coincided with a better dry-to-wet ratio and water activity
medium confidence
favors Run 3
Tap for details →
+1.1% THC
Lower runoff EC in late flower correlated with higher cannabinoid expression
medium confidence
favors Run 3
Tap for details →
🚀 Next-Run Considerations
Maintain the tighter environment protocols from Run 3: particularly the day temp band under 1.5°F variance during weeks 4-6.
This is the strongest measured candidate for a controlled repeat. The comparison cannot isolate it from every other run difference.
Based on: Run 3 (Subject)
Target 11-13 day dry at 58-60°F and 55-58% RH. Do not pull before water activity reaches 0.59 or below.
The 3-day longer dry coincided with the stronger dry-to-wet ratio and a stable final water activity. Repeat it while measuring enough dry-room positions to test whether that relationship holds.
Based on: Run 3 (Subject)
Consider a 10-15% EC reduction starting week 7 to replicate the improved cannabinoid profile from Run 3.
While correlation is not causation, two consecutive runs show higher THC coinciding with lower late-flower EC. Worth maintaining as a controlled variable.
Based on: Run 3 (Subject)
📋 Data Quality
Run 3 (Subject): coverage 92%, reliability high
Run 1 (Compare): coverage 85%, reliability high
- Limited dry room humidity data in first 48 hours
Model: claude-opus-4 •
Generated: 2026-04-02 14:23